PapersFlow Research Brief

Social Sciences · Arts and Humanities

Indian and Buddhist Studies
Research Guide

What is Indian and Buddhist Studies?

Indian and Buddhist Studies is an interdisciplinary academic field that investigates the texts, histories, philosophies, and lived religious cultures of South Asia and Buddhist traditions across Asia using philological, historical, philosophical, and social-scientific methods.

The Indian and Buddhist Studies literature cluster contains 175,472 works spanning Buddhist history, culture, philosophy, modernization, and interactions with other religious and cultural traditions in South and East Asia. "The Making of Buddhist Modernism" (2009) frames “Buddhist modernism” as a distinct hybrid form shaped by cross-cultural genealogies over roughly the last 150 years. "What does mindfulness really mean? A canonical perspective" (2011) exemplifies text-critical method by interpreting mindfulness through the Pāli Canon as a primary source.

Topic Hierarchy

100%
graph TD D["Social Sciences"] F["Arts and Humanities"] S["Religious studies"] T["Indian and Buddhist Studies"] D --> F F --> S S --> T style T fill:#DC5238,stroke:#c4452e,stroke-width:2px
Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan
175.5K
Papers
N/A
5yr Growth
170.1K
Total Citations

Research Sub-Topics

Why It Matters

Indian and Buddhist Studies supports real-world work in education, heritage preservation, and the responsible transfer of contemplative practices into clinical and secular settings. In applied mindfulness contexts, Bhikkhu Bodhi (2011) in "What does mindfulness really mean? A canonical perspective" argues for defining mindfulness by its canonical functions in satipaṭṭhāna practice, providing a concrete basis for curriculum design and for evaluating whether modern “mindfulness” programs align with early textual meanings. In contemporary religious change and public culture, David L. McMahan (2009) in "The Making of Buddhist Modernism" analyzes how a modern hybrid Buddhism formed through cross-cultural transmission, which is directly relevant for museums, universities, and policy-facing educators who must explain why present-day Buddhist identities and practices often differ from premodern monastic or textual models. For ethics and normativity in fieldwork and comparative religion, James Laidlaw (2002) in "For An Anthropology Of Ethics And Freedom" provides a research program for studying ethics together with freedom, helping practitioners and researchers avoid treating moral life as only “rule-following” and improving the interpretability of ethnographic findings used in education and public discourse.

Reading Guide

Where to Start

Start with Bhikkhu Bodhi’s "What does mindfulness really mean? A canonical perspective" (2011) because it models how to build an argument from a defined primary corpus (the Pāli Canon) and shows what “method” looks like in practice: explicit source selection, close reading, and conceptual delimitation.

Key Papers Explained

Bodhi’s "What does mindfulness really mean? A canonical perspective" (2011) and McMahan’s "The Making of Buddhist Modernism" (2009) complement each other by pairing primary-text conceptual analysis with a historical account of modern hybridization in Buddhist practice and identity. Laidlaw’s "For An Anthropology Of Ethics And Freedom" (2002) adds a fieldwork-facing theory of ethics that helps connect textual norms to lived agency, making it a methodological bridge between canonical study and contemporary Buddhist worlds. "The Religion of India: The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism." (1959) provides a sociological baseline for thinking about Buddhism and Hinduism as social formations, offering a macro frame that can be put in dialogue with McMahan’s modernism thesis and Laidlaw’s ethics program.

Paper Timeline

100%
graph LR P0["The Religion of India: The Socio...
1959 · 597 cites"] P1["Lectures on the Philosophy of Wo...
1975 · 1.1K cites"] P2["Tata Lectures on Theta I
1983 · 731 cites"] P3["The Myth of Asia's Miracle
1994 · 2.3K cites"] P4["Tata Lectures on Theta I
2007 · 1.4K cites"] P5["The Making of Buddhist Modernism
2009 · 627 cites"] P6["What does mindfulness really mea...
2011 · 607 cites"] P0 --> P1 P1 --> P2 P2 --> P3 P3 --> P4 P4 --> P5 P5 --> P6 style P3 fill:#DC5238,stroke:#c4452e,stroke-width:2px
Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan

Most-cited paper highlighted in red. Papers ordered chronologically.

Advanced Directions

A current frontier is aligning large-scale text corpora and digital infrastructures with classical philology and intellectual history, so that arguments like those in "The Making of Buddhist Modernism" (2009) and "What does mindfulness really mean? A canonical perspective" (2011) can be tested across broader multilingual evidence while retaining source-critical rigor. Another frontier is method integration: using the comparative-ethical clarity modeled in "Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy" (2007) together with the freedom-focused ethnographic agenda of "For An Anthropology Of Ethics And Freedom" (2002) to produce studies that are simultaneously text-grounded, normatively explicit, and empirically accountable.

Papers at a Glance

# Paper Year Venue Citations Open Access
1 The Myth of Asia's Miracle 1994 Foreign Affairs 2.3K
2 Tata Lectures on Theta I 2007 Birkhäuser Boston eBooks 1.4K
3 Lectures on the Philosophy of World History 1975 Cambridge University P... 1.1K
4 Tata Lectures on Theta I 1983 Progress in mathematics 731
5 The Making of Buddhist Modernism 2009 627
6 What does mindfulness really mean? A canonical perspective 2011 Contemporary Buddhism 607
7 The Religion of India: The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism. 1959 American Sociological ... 597
8 For An Anthropology Of Ethics And Freedom 2002 Journal of the Royal A... 596
9 Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy 2007 Cambridge University P... 577
10 Buddha Is Hiding 2019 576

In the News

Code & Tools

Recent Preprints

Latest Developments

Recent developments in Indian and Buddhist Studies research include the opening of applications for interdisciplinary Buddhist Studies programs in India and Thailand for Fall 2026, focusing on Buddhism's history and traditions (Carleton College, published January 14, 2026). Additionally, the 2nd Global Buddhist Summit was held in New Delhi on January 24-25, 2026, addressing contemporary global challenges (PIB, published January 17, 2026). There are ongoing scholarly conferences, such as the 2026 UKABS conference on "Buddhism and Emotion" scheduled for June 2026 in Edinburgh (buddhist-studies.ed.ac.uk, published July 31, 2025). Furthermore, research continues into historical texts and digital resources, including the development of the Sanskrit and Chinese Buddhist Library Network supported by the Buddhist Digital Resource Center, which aims to enhance access to Buddhist texts (BDRC, published July 16, 2020).

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between Buddhist modernism and premodern Buddhist traditions?

McMahan (2009) in "The Making of Buddhist Modernism" describes Buddhist modernism as a distinct hybrid form with a cross-cultural genealogy rather than simply “Buddhism in the modern world.” "The Making of Buddhist Modernism" (2009) situates its formation within roughly the last 150 years and emphasizes historically contingent themes, ideas, and practices that differ from many premodern configurations.

How do researchers in Indian and Buddhist Studies define mindfulness when working from early sources?

Bhikkhu Bodhi (2011) in "What does mindfulness really mean? A canonical perspective" defines and evaluates mindfulness by reading it through the Pāli Canon as the oldest complete intact collection of Buddhist texts. "What does mindfulness really mean? A canonical perspective" (2011) treats mindfulness as central to satipaṭṭhāna practice and uses canonical context to specify meaning and function.

Which methods are central to Indian and Buddhist Studies across texts and lived practice?

"What does mindfulness really mean? A canonical perspective" (2011) exemplifies philological and canonical interpretation by treating a classical corpus (the Pāli Canon) as the primary evidentiary base for conceptual analysis. "For An Anthropology Of Ethics And Freedom" (2002) exemplifies ethnographic and comparative-theoretical method by arguing that an anthropology of ethics requires sustained attention to freedom as an object of study.

How is ethics studied comparatively in Buddhist and South Asian contexts without reducing it to rules?

Laidlaw (2002) in "For An Anthropology Of Ethics And Freedom" argues that a developed anthropology of ethics must also include ethnographic and theoretical interest in freedom. "For An Anthropology Of Ethics And Freedom" (2002) proposes studying ethical life comparatively by examining how agents understand and enact freedom, not only how they comply with norms.

Which highly cited works in this cluster shape cross-disciplinary conversations beyond Buddhist Studies narrowly construed?

"The Religion of India: The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism." (1959) anchors sociological approaches to Hinduism and Buddhism within broader social-scientific debates. Krugman’s "The Myth of Asia's Miracle" (1994) is also among the most-cited works in the cluster and is often used when scholarship connects Asian religious modernities to wider discussions of Asian economic narratives.

Which texts can help situate Buddhist and Indian materials within broader philosophies of history and comparative philosophy?

"Lectures on the Philosophy of World History" (1975) provides a canonical reference point for philosophy-of-history framing that scholars sometimes use when positioning South Asian and Buddhist histories in global narratives. "Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy" (2007) offers a comparative model for close textual exegesis and normative analysis that can inform cross-Asian ethical comparison alongside Buddhist and Indian materials.

Open Research Questions

  • ? How can canonical analyses like "What does mindfulness really mean? A canonical perspective" (2011) be operationalized into explicit criteria for evaluating modern mindfulness claims without collapsing diverse Buddhist meditative taxonomies into a single construct?
  • ? Which specific cross-cultural transmission pathways are most responsible for the themes McMahan identifies in "The Making of Buddhist Modernism" (2009), and how can those pathways be tested against multilingual textual and institutional archives?
  • ? How can Laidlaw’s program in "For An Anthropology Of Ethics And Freedom" (2002) be adapted to Buddhist monastic and lay settings to measure “freedom” ethnographically while avoiding imposing liberal individualist assumptions?
  • ? What conceptual links, if any, can be defended between macro-level narratives about Asia in "The Myth of Asia's Miracle" (1994) and micro-level accounts of Buddhist modernization in "The Making of Buddhist Modernism" (2009) without treating economic growth narratives as proxies for religious change?
  • ? Which comparative ethical frameworks best enable rigorous comparison between Buddhist ethics and other Asian traditions when using models like "Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy" (2007) without erasing tradition-specific soteriological aims?

Research Indian and Buddhist Studies with AI

PapersFlow provides specialized AI tools for Arts and Humanities researchers. Here are the most relevant for this topic:

See how researchers in Arts & Humanities use PapersFlow

Field-specific workflows, example queries, and use cases.

Arts & Humanities Guide

Start Researching Indian and Buddhist Studies with AI

Search 474M+ papers, run AI-powered literature reviews, and write with integrated citations — all in one workspace.

See how PapersFlow works for Arts and Humanities researchers