PapersFlow Research Brief

Health Sciences · Medicine

Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
Research Guide

What is Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries?

Shoulder and clavicle injuries encompass clavicle fractures and acromioclavicular joint injuries, along with associated shoulder pathologies such as rotator cuff ruptures, proximal humeral fractures, and impingement syndromes, studied through their epidemiology, nonoperative and surgical treatments, and complications.

This field includes 47,184 papers on the epidemiology, nonoperative and surgical treatment, and complications of clavicle fractures and acromioclavicular joint injuries. Key areas cover nonunion risk, biomechanical evaluations, anatomical reconstructions, and midshaft fractures. Research also addresses rotator cuff tears, proximal humeral fractures, and impingement syndromes through classification systems and treatment outcomes.

Topic Hierarchy

100%
graph TD D["Health Sciences"] F["Medicine"] S["Epidemiology"] T["Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries"] D --> F F --> S S --> T style T fill:#DC5238,stroke:#c4452e,stroke-width:2px
Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan
47.2K
Papers
N/A
5yr Growth
348.5K
Total Citations

Research Sub-Topics

Why It Matters

Shoulder and clavicle injuries impact clinical practice by guiding treatment choices for common orthopedic conditions. Constant and Murley (1987) in "A Clinical Method of Functional Assessment of the Shoulder" provide a standardized method applicable across diagnostic variations, enabling consistent evaluation of shoulder function post-injury or surgery. Neer (1970) in "Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation" classified injuries based on roentgenographic appearance and anatomy from 300 cases, improving surgical planning for proximal humeral fractures. Goutallier et al. (1994) in "Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan" graded fatty degeneration in 63 rotator cuff repair patients, showing progression despite repair in 57 cases after 17.7 months, which informs prognosis and operative decisions. Galatz et al. (2004) reported high recurrent defect rates in arthroscopically repaired large rotator cuff tears despite pain relief, highlighting limitations in repair integrity.

Reading Guide

Where to Start

"A Clinical Method of Functional Assessment of the Shoulder" by Constant and Murley (1987) is the starting point for beginners, as it provides a practical, standardized tool for evaluating shoulder function across various injuries, essential for understanding outcomes in this field.

Key Papers Explained

Constant and Murley (1987) in "A Clinical Method of Functional Assessment of the Shoulder" establishes functional evaluation metrics used in later works. Neer (1970) in "Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation" builds foundational classification for proximal humeral injuries from 300 cases. Goutallier et al. (1994) in "Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan" extends this by quantifying muscle changes in 63 cuff rupture patients pre- and post-repair. Galatz et al. (2004) in "The Outcome and Repair Integrity of Completely Arthroscopically Repaired Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears" applies these concepts to arthroscopic repairs, revealing high retear rates. Marsh et al. (2007) in "Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium - 2007" provides a comprehensive system encompassing clavicle and shoulder fractures.

Paper Timeline

100%
graph LR P0["Anterior Acromioplasty for the C...
1972 · 2.1K cites"] P1["A Clinical Method of Functional ...
1987 · 5.2K cites"] P2["Fatty muscle degeneration in cuf...
1994 · 2.6K cites"] P3["Fatty Muscle Degeneration in Cuf...
1994 · 2.0K cites"] P4["Rockwood and Green’s fractures i...
1997 · 2.1K cites"] P5["The Outcome and Repair Integrity...
2004 · 2.1K cites"] P6["Fracture and Dislocation Classif...
2007 · 2.3K cites"] P0 --> P1 P1 --> P2 P2 --> P3 P3 --> P4 P4 --> P5 P5 --> P6 style P1 fill:#DC5238,stroke:#c4452e,stroke-width:2px
Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan

Most-cited paper highlighted in red. Papers ordered chronologically.

Advanced Directions

Current frontiers emphasize epidemiological trends and complication rates in clavicle fractures and acromioclavicular injuries, including nonunion risks and surgical optimizations. No recent preprints or news in the last 12 months indicate steady incorporation of established classifications like Neer (1970) and Marsh et al. (2007) into ongoing management protocols.

Papers at a Glance

# Paper Year Venue Citations Open Access
1 A Clinical Method of Functional Assessment of the Shoulder 1987 Clinical Orthopaedics ... 5.2K
2 Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postopera... 1994 PubMed 2.6K
3 Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium - 2007 2007 Journal of Orthopaedic... 2.3K
4 Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults. 1997 Journal of Bone and Jo... 2.1K
5 The Outcome and Repair Integrity of Completely Arthroscopicall... 2004 Journal of Bone and Jo... 2.1K
6 Anterior Acromioplasty for the Chronic Impingement Syndrome in... 1972 Journal of Bone and Jo... 2.1K
7 Fatty Muscle Degeneration in Cuff Ruptures 1994 Clinical Orthopaedics ... 2.0K
8 Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and ev... 1970 PubMed 2.0K
9 Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures 1970 Journal of Bone and Jo... 1.9K
10 Anterior Acromioplasty for the Chronic Impingement Syndrome in... 2013 1.9K

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Constant-Murley score for shoulder assessment?

The Constant-Murley score, described in "A Clinical Method of Functional Assessment of the Shoulder" by Constant and Murley (1987), evaluates shoulder function irrespective of specific diagnostic or radiologic abnormalities. It records individual parameters of pain, activities of daily living, mobility, and strength. This method applies broadly to injuries including those of the shoulder and clavicle.

How is fatty degeneration assessed in rotator cuff ruptures?

Fatty degeneration in rotator cuff ruptures is graded in five stages using preoperative CT scans, as detailed by Goutallier et al. (1994) in "Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan." In 63 patients, progression occurred postoperatively in many cases evaluated after 17.7 months via arthrography. This grading predicts repair outcomes.

What classification is used for proximal humeral fractures?

Neer (1970) in "Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation" proposed a classification for displaced proximal humeral fractures and dislocations based on roentgenographic appearance and anatomy from 300 cases. Existing systems were inadequate for the lesions observed. The system categorizes injuries to guide treatment.

What are outcomes of arthroscopic repair for massive rotator cuff tears?

Galatz et al. (2004) in "The Outcome and Repair Integrity of Completely Arthroscopically Repaired Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears" found high recurrent defect rates at minimum 12 months despite excellent pain relief and improved daily activities. This indicates limitations in achieving durable tendon integrity arthroscopically. Patients still report functional gains.

What is the role of anterior acromioplasty in shoulder impingement?

Neer (1972) in "Anterior Acromioplasty for the Chronic Impingement Syndrome in the Shoulder" identified impingement by the coraco-acromial ligament and anterior acromion on the rotator cuff as causing shoulder disability. A proliferative spur and ridge on the anterior acromion contributes to this syndrome. Anterior acromioplasty addresses this pathology.

What comprehensive classification exists for fractures including clavicle?

Marsh et al. (2007) in "Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium - 2007" republished the Orthopaedic Trauma Association's classification, adopting elements from the Comprehensive Classification of Long Bones. It covers fractures and dislocations, applicable to clavicle and shoulder injuries. This system standardizes description for treatment and research.

Open Research Questions

  • ? How can nonunion risk in midshaft clavicle fractures be minimized through nonoperative versus surgical management?
  • ? What biomechanical factors optimize coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction outcomes?
  • ? Which patient factors best predict progression of fatty degeneration in rotator cuff tears post-repair?
  • ? How do classification systems for acromioclavicular joint injuries correlate with long-term functional outcomes?
  • ? What anatomical reconstruction techniques reduce complications in displaced clavicle fractures?

Research Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries with AI

PapersFlow provides specialized AI tools for Medicine researchers. Here are the most relevant for this topic:

See how researchers in Health & Medicine use PapersFlow

Field-specific workflows, example queries, and use cases.

Health & Medicine Guide

Start Researching Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries with AI

Search 474M+ papers, run AI-powered literature reviews, and write with integrated citations — all in one workspace.

See how PapersFlow works for Medicine researchers