Subtopic Deep Dive

Stakeholder Analysis in Higher Education
Research Guide

What is Stakeholder Analysis in Higher Education?

Stakeholder Analysis in Higher Education maps interests and influences of students, faculty, governments, and industry on university governance and decision-making.

This subtopic applies stakeholder theory to higher education institutions facing globalization and competition (Marić, 2013, 51 citations). Research emphasizes student voices in quality improvement (Degtjarjova et al., 2018, 45 citations) and social responsibility perceptions (Kvasničková Stanislavská et al., 2014, 16 citations). Approximately 10 key papers exist from 2013-2024.

Curated Papers

Key Challenges

Why It Matters

Stakeholder analysis guides equitable funding allocation and policy reforms in universities, especially in competitive global markets (Marić, 2013). It enhances quality development by integrating student feedback as 'voice of customer' (Degtjarjova et al., 2018). In developing contexts, it supports governance alignment amid digital shifts, as seen in blockchain e-portfolio designs (Purnama et al., 2021).

Key Research Challenges

Mapping Diverse Interests

Identifying conflicting priorities among students, faculty, and governments remains complex due to globalization pressures (Marić, 2013). Empirical mapping lacks standardized tools across institutions. Recent studies highlight student satisfaction gaps in quality processes (Degtjarjova et al., 2018).

Integrating Student Voices

Treating students as primary stakeholders requires continuous feedback mechanisms, often overlooked in traditional governance (Degtjarjova et al., 2018). HEIs struggle with implementation amid digital transitions. Social responsibility views differ between current and potential students (Kvasničková Stanislavská et al., 2014).

Balancing External Pressures

Industry and government influences on funding create tensions with internal academic goals (Marić, 2013). Competition demands adaptive strategies without clear frameworks. Tech integrations like blockchain add stakeholder coordination challenges (Purnama et al., 2021).

Essential Papers

The Effectiveness and Challenges of Online Learning for Secondary School Students – A Case Study

Zulaikha Mohd Basar, Azlin Norhaini Mansor, Khairul Azhar Jamaludin et al. · 2021 · Asian Journal of University Education · 217 citations

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has forced an immediate implementation of online learning. However, little is known about its effectiveness and challenges faced by the students. Thus, this study is...

Factors Influencing Consumer Behavior towards Online Shopping in Saudi Arabia Amid COVID-19: Implications for E-Businesses Post Pandemic

Sarah S. Al Hamli, Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih · 2023 · Journal of risk and financial management · 63 citations

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has significantly reshaped consumer behaviors in Saudi Arabia, as in most other countries worldwide, and it has played a critical role in rising commercial o...

Stakeholder Analisys of Higher Education Institutions

Ivana Marić · 2013 · Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems · 51 citations

In recent years, knowledge, the human capital, and learning organizations have become the key determinants of current global progress. Higher educational sector has been faced with globalization an...

Student as stakeholder: “voice of customer” in higher education quality development

Irina Degtjarjova, Inga Lapiņa, Davis Freidenfelds et al. · 2018 · Marketing and Management of Innovations · 45 citations

According to the continuous improvement principles, all Higher Education Institutions (hereafter - HEIs) focus on the requirement to improve organizational processes and achieve quality, create add...

Design of Educational Learning Management Cloud Process with Blockchain 4.0 based E-Portfolio

Suryari Purnama, Qurotul Aini, Untung Rahardja et al. · 2021 · Journal of Education Technology · 42 citations

The development of technology in education has produced many innovations to support the learning process. The large variety of learning media is the digital competence of education, which is very m...

Innovation in Smart Marketing: The Role of Technopreneurs in Driving Educational Improvement

Umi Rusilowati, Fitra Putri Oganda, Reymund Rahardja et al. · 2023 · Aptisi Transactions On Technopreneurship (ATT) · 28 citations

This study explores the influence of marketing strategies, technology utilization, inclusive education policies, and collaboration with the industry sector on the positive image of educational inst...

Edge Computing in E-commerce Business: Economic Impacts and Advantages of Scalable Information Systems

Dikson Silitonga, Siti Alfia Ayu Rohmayanti, Zaenal Aripin et al. · 2023 · ICST Transactions on Scalable Information Systems · 26 citations

INTRODUCTION: Edge Computing brings better responsiveness and faster customer experiences, while Scalable Information Systems enable efficient business growth management. OBJECTIVE: This research a...

Reading Guide

Foundational Papers

Start with Marić (2013, 51 citations) for core stakeholder mapping in competitive HE sectors; follow with Kvasničková Stanislavská et al. (2014, 16 citations) on social responsibility views.

Recent Advances

Study Degtjarjova et al. (2018, 45 citations) for student 'voice of customer' integration; Purnama et al. (2021, 42 citations) on blockchain e-portfolios.

Core Methods

Stakeholder identification frameworks (Marić, 2013); continuous improvement via feedback (Degtjarjova et al., 2018); social responsibility surveys (Kvasničková Stanislavská et al., 2014).

How PapersFlow Helps You Research Stakeholder Analysis in Higher Education

Discover & Search

Research Agent uses searchPapers and citationGraph on Marić (2013) to map 51-citation foundational work and its connections to Degtjarjova et al. (2018). exaSearch uncovers related stakeholder papers in higher ed governance; findSimilarPapers expands to social responsibility studies like Kvasničková Stanislavská et al. (2014).

Analyze & Verify

Analysis Agent applies readPaperContent to extract stakeholder frameworks from Marić (2013), then verifyResponse with CoVe checks claims against abstracts. runPythonAnalysis with pandas tallies stakeholder mentions across 10 papers for citation trends; GRADE grading scores evidence strength in quality improvement claims (Degtjarjova et al., 2018).

Synthesize & Write

Synthesis Agent detects gaps in student-industry alignment from Marić (2013) and Degtjarjova et al. (2018), flags contradictions in social responsibility (Kvasničková Stanislavská et al., 2014). Writing Agent uses latexEditText, latexSyncCitations for governance reports, latexCompile for publication-ready docs, exportMermaid for stakeholder influence diagrams.

Use Cases

"Run statistical analysis on stakeholder citation trends from 2013-2024 papers."

Research Agent → searchPapers → Analysis Agent → runPythonAnalysis (pandas/matplotlib plots trends from Marić 51 citations vs. Degtjarjova 45) → CSV export of quantified influences.

"Draft LaTeX report on student stakeholder roles in HE quality."

Research Agent → citationGraph (Degtjarjova et al., 2018) → Synthesis → gap detection → Writing Agent → latexEditText + latexSyncCitations + latexCompile → PDF with stakeholder framework diagram.

"Find GitHub repos implementing HE stakeholder models."

Research Agent → paperExtractUrls (Purnama et al., 2021 blockchain) → Code Discovery → paperFindGithubRepo → githubRepoInspect → Verified repos for e-portfolio stakeholder tools.

Automated Workflows

Deep Research workflow conducts systematic review: searchPapers (50+ higher ed papers) → citationGraph → structured report on governance conflicts (Marić, 2013). DeepScan applies 7-step analysis with CoVe checkpoints to verify stakeholder mappings in Degtjarjova et al. (2018). Theorizer generates theory on student-centered frameworks from literature gaps.

Try Doxa for Stakeholder Analysis in Higher Education Research

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Stakeholder Analysis in Higher Education?

It maps interests of students, faculty, governments, and industry in university governance (Marić, 2013).

What methods are used?

Frameworks identify key stakeholders and resolve conflicts via student feedback and social responsibility assessments (Degtjarjova et al., 2018; Kvasničková Stanislavská et al., 2014).

What are key papers?

Marić (2013, 51 citations) provides foundational analysis; Degtjarjova et al. (2018, 45 citations) focuses on students as stakeholders.

What open problems exist?

Standardizing tools for diverse stakeholder mapping and integrating digital tech like blockchain remain unresolved (Purnama et al., 2021; Marić, 2013).