Social Policies and Family
Research Guide

Research Sub-Topics

Why It Matters

Social policies directly structure families’ material security, caregiving capacity, and access to public services by allocating resources and defining eligibility, obligations, and rights. Atkinson’s "Inequality" (2015) argues that reducing inequality and poverty requires policy packages that extend beyond taxing high incomes, explicitly including proposals in technology, employment, social security, capital sharing, and taxation—domains that affect household earnings, transfers, and intergenerational resources. In practice, this policy logic matters for family-facing program design: for example, the recent news item "New Funding: Enhancing Employment and Well-Being for ..." reports $3.7m in funding from Employment and Social Development Canada’s Youth Employment and Skills Strategy program, illustrating how labor-market and skills policies are operationalized through targeted investments that can alter family economic prospects and support networks. More broadly, Young’s "Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship" (1989) provides a framework for evaluating whether “universal” policies inadvertently exclude or disadvantage groups with distinct social positions—an issue that becomes concrete when family policy must serve heterogeneous households rather than a single normative model. Foucault et al.’s "Naissance de la biopolitique : cours au collège de France (1978-1979)" (2004) is frequently used to interpret how governing through markets and social policy instruments can reorganize responsibilities between states, employers, and families, with implications for who bears the risks of care, unemployment, and poverty.

Reading Guide

Papers at a Glance

In the News

Code & Tools

Recent Preprints

Latest Developments

Frequently Asked Questions

Open Research Questions

• ? How can anti-inequality policy packages of the kind proposed in "Inequality" (2015) be translated into implementable program rules that measurably reduce poverty while balancing labor-market incentives and household caregiving constraints?
• ? Which concrete policy design features operationalize the inclusion concerns raised in "Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship" (1989) when eligibility categories and administrative procedures interact with diverse family forms?
• ? How do the governing rationalities analyzed in "Naissance de la biopolitique : cours au collège de France (1978-1979)" (2004) shape the division of responsibility for welfare between state, market, and family, and what are the downstream effects on care burdens and economic risk within households?
• ? What are the implications of gendered subject formation and social norms—often discussed through texts such as "Le deuxième sexe" (1949) and "Ce sexe qui n'en est pas un" (1974)—for the uptake and distributional impact of family benefits and services?
• ? How should researchers integrate education-system expansion dynamics discussed in "80 % au bac… et après ?" (2003) into models of intergenerational mobility and family inequality when education policy is treated as a family policy instrument?

Research Social Policies and Family with AI

PapersFlow provides specialized AI tools for your field researchers. Here are the most relevant for this topic: