PapersFlow Research Brief

Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Research Guide

What is Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty?

Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty refers to the surgical replacement of damaged joints with artificial implants, such as hip and knee prostheses, and the development of biocompatible materials for bone repair and reconstruction.

The field encompasses over 123,219 published works on orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty. Key materials include titanium-based alloys, bioceramics, and magnesium alloys evaluated for implant applications. Projections indicate substantial increases in primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasties in the United States from 2005 to 2030.

123.2K
Papers
N/A
5yr Growth
1.8M
Total Citations

Research Sub-Topics

Why It Matters

Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty address the rising demand for joint replacements, with Kurtz et al. (2007) in "Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030" projecting large increases in procedures that inform policy on surgeon numbers and resources. Titanium biomaterials, reviewed by Geetha et al. (2008) in "Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants – A review", provide strength and biocompatibility for long-term implants. Recent developments include Zimmer Biomet's FDA Breakthrough Designation for an iodine-treated total hip replacement system to prevent infections and CustoMED's $6M funding for AI-powered 3D printed orthopedic solutions, enhancing surgical precision and patient outcomes.

Reading Guide

Where to Start

"Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030" by Kurtz et al. (2007), as it provides essential quantitative projections on procedure volumes, foundational for understanding clinical demand and resource planning.

Key Papers Explained

Kurtz et al. (2007) in "Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030" establish demand forecasts that contextualize material needs addressed by Geetha et al. (2008) in "Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants – A review". Kokubo and Takadama (2006) in "How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?" build testing standards for bioactivity relevant to Hench (1991) "Bioceramics: From Concept to Clinic", which classifies ceramics foundational to scaffolds in Karageorgiou and Kaplan (2005) "Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis".

Paper Timeline

100%
graph LR P0["Traumatic Arthritis of the Hip a...
1969 · 5.6K cites"] P1["Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaff...
2005 · 6.3K cites"] P2["How useful is SBF in predicting ...
2006 · 9.2K cites"] P3["Projections of Primary and Revis...
2007 · 6.8K cites"] P4["Projections of Primary and Revis...
2007 · 5.4K cites"] P5["Ti based biomaterials, the ultim...
2008 · 5.1K cites"] P6["Traumatic Arthritis of the Hip A...
2013 · 5.1K cites"] P0 --> P1 P1 --> P2 P2 --> P3 P3 --> P4 P4 --> P5 P5 --> P6 style P2 fill:#DC5238,stroke:#c4452e,stroke-width:2px
Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan

Most-cited paper highlighted in red. Papers ordered chronologically.

Advanced Directions

Recent news highlights Zimmer Biomet's FDA Breakthrough Designation for an iodine-treated hip implant system and CustoMED's $6M funding for AI-powered 3D printed solutions. AI applications show 99% accuracy in classifying knee and hip implants per Dr. Ramkumar's studies in The Journal of Arthroplasty.

Papers at a Glance

# Paper Year Venue Citations Open Access
1 How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? 2006 Biomaterials 9.2K
2 Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty ... 2007 Journal of Bone and Jo... 6.8K
3 Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis 2005 Biomaterials 6.3K
4 Traumatic Arthritis of the Hip after Dislocation and Acetabula... 1969 Journal of Bone and Jo... 5.6K
5 Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty ... 2007 Journal of Bone and Jo... 5.4K
6 Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic imp... 2008 Progress in Materials ... 5.1K
7 Traumatic Arthritis of the Hip After Dislocation and Acetabula... 2013 5.1K
8 Bioceramics: From Concept to Clinic 1991 Journal of the America... 4.9K
9 Magnesium and its alloys as orthopedic biomaterials: A review 2005 Biomaterials 4.3K
10 Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite... 2006 Biomaterials 3.7K

In the News

Code & Tools

Recent Preprints

Latest Developments

Recent developments in orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty research include the successful clinical use of the FDA-approved Freedom Total Knee implant with robotic assistance in April 2026 (Bonezone), advancements in materials science and digital technologies enhancing implant performance (Springer Nature, BMC), and promising long-term results of cementless total knee arthroplasty with 10-year survivorship rates exceeding 96% (Arthroplasty Journal00171-8/abstract)).

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the projected increases in hip and knee arthroplasties in the US?

Kurtz et al. (2007) in "Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030" project large increases in primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasties from 2005 to 2030. These projections provide a basis for policy decisions on orthopaedic surgeons and resources.

Why are Ti-based materials used for orthopaedic implants?

Geetha et al. (2008) in "Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants – A review" highlight titanium alloys for their mechanical properties and biocompatibility in orthopaedic applications. They offer the ultimate choice due to strength, corrosion resistance, and integration with bone.

What types of bioceramics are used in musculoskeletal repair?

Hench (1991) in "Bioceramics: From Concept to Clinic" describes bioceramics as bioinert (alumina, zirconia), resorbable (tricalcium phosphate), bioactive (hydroxyapatite, bioactive glasses), or porous for tissue ingrowth. These ceramics repair and reconstruct diseased or damaged musculoskeletal parts.

How does porosity affect osteogenesis in biomaterial scaffolds?

Karageorgiou and Kaplan (2005) in "Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis" examine how scaffold porosity influences bone formation. Optimal porosity levels enhance cell migration, vascularization, and new bone growth in tissue engineering.

What role does SBF play in assessing bone bioactivity?

Kokubo and Takadama (2006) in "How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?" evaluate simulated body fluid (SBF) for predicting implant bioactivity. SBF testing simulates in vivo conditions to assess apatite formation on biomaterials.

What are the applications of magnesium alloys in orthopaedics?

Staiger et al. (2005) in "Magnesium and its alloys as orthopedic biomaterials: A review" review magnesium alloys for their biodegradability and mechanical properties matching bone. They degrade over time, reducing long-term implant removal needs.

Open Research Questions

  • ? How can porosity in 3D scaffolds be optimized for maximal osteogenesis in load-bearing implants?
  • ? What improvements in SBF testing are needed for more accurate prediction of in vivo bone bioactivity?
  • ? Which titanium alloy modifications best balance strength, biocompatibility, and osseointegration for long-term implants?
  • ? How do biodegradable magnesium alloys perform under physiological loads without premature degradation?
  • ? What design parameters in porous polymer/inorganic composites maximize bone tissue engineering outcomes?

Research Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty with AI

PapersFlow provides specialized AI tools for your field researchers. Here are the most relevant for this topic:

Start Researching Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty with AI

Search 474M+ papers, run AI-powered literature reviews, and write with integrated citations — all in one workspace.