Subtopic Deep Dive
Biopolitics of Pandemics
Research Guide
What is Biopolitics of Pandemics?
Biopolitics of pandemics examines how crises like COVID-19 expose biopolitical mechanisms of surveillance, exception, and population control in global health governance.
This subtopic applies Michel Foucault's biopolitics framework to analyze pandemic responses, focusing on state powers over bodies and populations. Key studies critique measures like lockdowns and tracking apps in countries such as Denmark and Italy. Over 10 papers from 2020-2024 address these dynamics, with Lorenzini (2020) leading at 143 citations.
Why It Matters
Research on biopolitics of pandemics informs policy design to protect civil liberties amid health emergencies, as seen in Højme's (2022) Foucauldian analysis of Danish lockdowns balancing security and rights. It reveals surveillance risks from tech-driven responses, detailed in Maschewski and Nosthoff (2022) on Big Tech's role in body governance. Olivier (2022, 2023) extends this by critiquing Agamben's homo sacer concept applied to pandemic bare life, aiding equitable crisis management.
Key Research Challenges
Interpreting Foucault vs Agamben
Scholars debate whether Foucault's biopolitics or Agamben's state of exception better explains pandemic controls. Lindholm (2024) argues Agamben's COVID critique misapplies biopolitics to Italy's response. This tension complicates unified theoretical frameworks.
Surveillance in Digital Biopolitics
Big Tech integration into health tracking raises überwachungskapitalistische biopolitik concerns. Maschewski and Nosthoff (2022) analyze corporate governance of bodies during COVID. Balancing efficacy and privacy remains unresolved.
Global vs Local Vulnerabilities
Pandemics highlight uneven biopolitical impacts across globalization. Gassner (2020) proposes affirmative shared vulnerability politics post-Corona. Golikov (2020) links this to discourse, emergency, and fear in Ukraine.
Essential Papers
Biopolitics in the Time of Coronavirus
Daniele Lorenzini · 2020 · Critical Inquiry · 143 citations
In a recent blog post, Joshua Clover rightly notices the swift emergence of a new panoply of “genres of the quarantine.”1 It should not come as a surprise that one of them centers on Michel Foucaul...
Biopolitics and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Foucauldian Interpretation of the Danish Government’s Response to the Pandemic
Philip Højme · 2022 · Philosophies · 17 citations
With the coronavirus pandemic and the Omicron variant once again forcing countries into lockdown (as of late 2021), this essay seeks to outline a Foucauldian critique of various legal measures take...
Überwachungskapitalistische Biopolitik: Big Tech und die Regierung der Körper
Felix Maschewski, Anna-Verena Nosthoff · 2022 · Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft · 7 citations
Beyond Agamben’s ‘Homo Sacer’
Bert Olivier · 2022 · Psychotherapy and Politics International · 3 citations
The current ‘pandemic’ is approached through the lens of (mainly) the concept of Homo sacer, elaborated on by Giorgio Agamben (1998). Taking the work of Michel Foucault on the ‘disciplinary society...
The (re-)birth of biopolitics. Autonomy, biopower, coronavirus, discourse, emergency, fear, globalization, health, I…
Alexander Golikov · 2020 · Ukrainian society · 3 citations
The article reveals the problems of biopolitics in a globalized world, which were actualized by the social, political, economic, cultural and other consequences of the pandemic. Based on the work o...
Giorgio Agamben’s Critique of the Covid-19 Response has Little to Do with Biopolitics
Samuel Lindholm · 2024 · Critical Horizons · 2 citations
Giorgio Agamben claims that the aggressive coronavirus response in Italy turned the nation’s entire population into formless bare life, which was cast out from meaningful human existence through a ...
Entgrenzte Körper. Zur Möglichkeit einer Politik affirmativ geteilter Vulnerabilität
Sonja Gassner · 2020 · Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie · 2 citations
Angesichts des Ausbruchs der Corona-Pandemie erfährt Foucaults Konzept der Biopolitik eine verstärkte Aufmerksamkeit innerhalb der politisch- philosophischen Debatten. So lässt sich in Rückgriff au...
Reading Guide
Foundational Papers
No pre-2015 foundational papers available; start with Lorenzini (2020) 'Biopolitics in the Time of Coronavirus' for core Foucault-COVID framing (143 citations), then Højme (2022) for empirical state case.
Recent Advances
Lindholm (2024) critiques Agamben's COVID biopolitics application; Olivier (2023) extends homo sacer beyond Agamben with Foucault's disciplinary society.
Core Methods
Foucauldian biopolitics analysis of discourse, power over life, and emergencies; Agamben state of exception critiques; philosophical interpretation of legal/health measures.
How PapersFlow Helps You Research Biopolitics of Pandemics
Discover & Search
PapersFlow's Research Agent uses searchPapers and exaSearch to find core works like Lorenzini (2020) 'Biopolitics in the Time of Coronavirus' (143 citations), then citationGraph reveals clusters around Foucault-Agamben debates, and findSimilarPapers uncovers related critiques like Højme (2022).
Analyze & Verify
Analysis Agent applies readPaperContent to extract Foucault interpretations from Lorenzini (2020), verifies claims via verifyResponse (CoVe) against Agamben critiques in Lindholm (2024), and uses runPythonAnalysis for citation network stats with pandas; GRADE grading scores evidence strength in biopolitical claims.
Synthesize & Write
Synthesis Agent detects gaps in Agamben-Foucault applications via gap detection, flags contradictions between Olivier (2022) and Lindholm (2024), then Writing Agent employs latexEditText, latexSyncCitations for Lorenzini (2020), and latexCompile for policy reports; exportMermaid visualizes biopolitics power flows.
Use Cases
"Analyze citation patterns in Foucault biopolitics papers on COVID lockdowns"
Research Agent → searchPapers('Foucault biopolitics COVID') → runPythonAnalysis (pandas citation network plot, centrality scores for Lorenzini 2020) → matplotlib export of top influencers.
"Draft LaTeX critique of Danish COVID biopolitics using Højme 2022"
Analysis Agent → readPaperContent (Højme 2022) → Synthesis → gap detection → Writing Agent → latexEditText (intro), latexSyncCitations (Foucault refs), latexCompile → PDF critique report.
"Find code repos modeling pandemic surveillance biopolitics"
Research Agent → searchPapers('surveillance biopolitics COVID Maschewski') → Code Discovery: paperExtractUrls → paperFindGithubRepo → githubRepoInspect (tracking sim code) → runPythonAnalysis sandbox test.
Automated Workflows
Deep Research workflow conducts systematic review: searchPapers (50+ biopolitics papers) → citationGraph → structured report on Foucault vs Agamben trends citing Lorenzini (2020). DeepScan applies 7-step analysis with CoVe checkpoints to verify Højme (2022) Danish case claims. Theorizer generates new biopolitical theory from Golikov (2020) and Gassner (2020) on vulnerability and globalization.
Frequently Asked Questions
What defines biopolitics of pandemics?
It analyzes how pandemics activate biopolitical controls like surveillance and exceptions, per Foucault, as in Lorenzini (2020) on COVID genres of quarantine.
What methods dominate this subtopic?
Foucauldian discourse analysis and Agamben-inspired exception critiques prevail, seen in Højme (2022) on Danish responses and Lindholm (2024) rebuttals.
Which are key papers?
Lorenzini (2020, 143 citations) leads on coronavirus biopolitics; Højme (2022, 17 citations) applies to Denmark; Maschewski & Nosthoff (2022) cover Big Tech surveillance.
What open problems exist?
Reconciling Foucault's biopower with Agamben's bare life in digital surveillance eras, plus affirmative vulnerability politics amid globalization, per Gassner (2020) and Golikov (2020).
Research Medical, Sociocultural, and Biopolitical Studies with AI
PapersFlow provides specialized AI tools for Social Sciences researchers. Here are the most relevant for this topic:
Systematic Review
AI-powered evidence synthesis with documented search strategies
AI Literature Review
Automate paper discovery and synthesis across 474M+ papers
Deep Research Reports
Multi-source evidence synthesis with counter-evidence
Find Disagreement
Discover conflicting findings and counter-evidence
See how researchers in Social Sciences use PapersFlow
Field-specific workflows, example queries, and use cases.
Start Researching Biopolitics of Pandemics with AI
Search 474M+ papers, run AI-powered literature reviews, and write with integrated citations — all in one workspace.
See how PapersFlow works for Social Sciences researchers