Subtopic Deep Dive
Laparoscopic management of adhesive small bowel obstruction
Research Guide
What is Laparoscopic management of adhesive small bowel obstruction?
Laparoscopic management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) involves diagnostic laparoscopy, adhesiolysis, enterotomy avoidance strategies, and predictors of conversion to laparotomy.
Guidelines from the World Society of Emergency Surgery outline laparoscopic approaches for ASBO, emphasizing patient selection and technique to reduce complications (ten Broek et al., 2018; 518 citations). Studies compare laparoscopic adhesiolysis outcomes to open surgery, showing faster recovery in selected cases (Sebastián Valverde et al., 2019; 64 citations). Over 1,000 citations across Bologna guidelines (2010-2018) guide this practice.
Why It Matters
Laparoscopic adhesiolysis halves adhesion formation in reoperations compared to laparotomy (ten Broek et al., 2012; 103 citations). It shortens hospital stays and improves functional recovery in ASBO patients with simple band adhesions (Sebastián Valverde et al., 2019). Di Saverio et al. (2018; 62 citations) stress surgeon experience reduces enterotomy risk, impacting emergency surgery outcomes in virgin abdomens (Amara et al., 2021).
Key Research Challenges
Patient Selection for Laparoscopy
Identifying ASBO cases suitable for laparoscopy avoids high-risk features like dense adhesions or ischemia. ten Broek et al. (2018) note scarce evidence for special groups. Conversion predictors remain inconsistent across studies.
Enterotomy Risk During Adhesiolysis
Laparoscopic adhesiolysis risks bowel injury, especially in complex obstructions. Di Saverio et al. (2018) report higher enterotomy rates for inexperienced surgeons. Techniques to minimize serosal trauma need refinement (Catena et al., 2016).
Surgeon Learning Curve and Outcomes
Laparoscopic success depends on experience, with variable conversion rates reported. Sebastián Valverde et al. (2019) highlight improved outcomes in high-volume centers. Standardization of training protocols is lacking.
Essential Papers
Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2017 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group
Richard P. G. ten Broek, Pepijn Krielen, Salomone Di Saverio et al. · 2018 · World Journal of Emergency Surgery · 518 citations
This guideline presents recommendations that can be used by surgeons who treat patients with ASBO. Scientific evidence for some aspects of ASBO management is scarce, in particular aspects relating ...
Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2013 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group
Salomone Di Saverio, Federico Coccolini, Marica Galati et al. · 2013 · World Journal of Emergency Surgery · 320 citations
Bowel obstruction: a narrative review for all physicians
Fausto Catena, Belinda De Simone, Federico Coccolini et al. · 2019 · World Journal of Emergency Surgery · 169 citations
Bologna Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction (ASBO): 2010 Evidence-Based Guidelines of the World Society of Emergency Surgery
Fausto Catena, Salomone Di Saverio, Michael D. Kelly et al. · 2011 · World Journal of Emergency Surgery · 156 citations
Adhesive small bowel adhesions obstruction: Evolutions in diagnosis, management and prevention?
Fausto Catena, Salomone Di Saverio, Federico Coccolini et al. · 2016 · World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · 108 citations
Intra-abdominal adhesions following abdominal surgery represent a major unsolved problem. They are the first cause of small bowel obstruction. Diagnosis is based on clinical evaluation, water-solub...
Different surgical techniques to reduce post-operative adhesion formation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Richard P. G. ten Broek, N. Kok- Krant, Erica A. Bakkum et al. · 2012 · Human Reproduction Update · 103 citations
INTRODUCTION Adhesion formation is the most common complication following peritoneal surgery and the leading cause of small bowel obstruction, acquired infertility and inadvertent organ injury at r...
The role of the laparoscopic approach in the surgical management of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction
Enric Sebastián Valverde, Ignasi Poves, Estela Membrilla-Fernández et al. · 2019 · BMC Surgery · 64 citations
Laparoscopic management of ASBO is feasible, effective and safe. The laparoscopic approach improves postoperative outcomes and functional recovery, and should be considered in patients in whom simp...
Reading Guide
Foundational Papers
Start with Di Saverio et al. (2013 Bologna guidelines; 320 citations) for core ASBO management, then Catena et al. (2011; 156 citations) for evidence base, and ten Broek et al. (2012; 103 citations) for adhesion prevention techniques.
Recent Advances
Study ten Broek et al. (2018; 518 citations) for updated laparoscopy recommendations, Sebastián Valverde et al. (2019; 64 citations) for approach feasibility, and Amara et al. (2021; 57 citations) for virgin abdomen cases.
Core Methods
Core techniques: diagnostic laparoscopy, blunt adhesiolysis, energy device use for dense bands, and conversion criteria based on ischemia or matting (ten Broek et al., 2018; Di Saverio et al., 2018).
How PapersFlow Helps You Research Laparoscopic management of adhesive small bowel obstruction
Discover & Search
Research Agent uses searchPapers and citationGraph on 'Bologna guidelines ASBO ten Broek 2018' to map 518 citing papers, revealing laparoscopic evolution from 2013 (Di Saverio et al.) to 2018 updates. exaSearch finds virgin abdomen cases (Amara et al., 2021), while findSimilarPapers clusters adhesiolysis techniques.
Analyze & Verify
Analysis Agent applies readPaperContent to extract adhesiolysis recommendations from ten Broek et al. (2018), then verifyResponse with CoVe checks claims against Di Saverio et al. (2018). runPythonAnalysis with pandas compares outcomes (e.g., conversion rates) across Sebastián Valverde et al. (2019) and Catena et al. (2019); GRADE grading scores guideline evidence levels.
Synthesize & Write
Synthesis Agent detects gaps in enterotomy avoidance post-Di Saverio et al. (2018), flags contradictions between 2017 and 2013 Bologna guidelines. Writing Agent uses latexEditText for surgical workflow diagrams, latexSyncCitations for 10+ references, latexCompile for review drafts, and exportMermaid for adhesion band classification flowcharts.
Use Cases
"Run meta-analysis on laparoscopic vs open ASBO outcomes from Bologna guidelines"
Research Agent → searchPapers (Bologna ASBO) → Analysis Agent → runPythonAnalysis (pandas meta-analysis on lengths-of-stay, complications) → GRADE grading → Synthesis Agent → exportCsv of pooled ORs with forest plots.
"Draft LaTeX review on laparoscopic adhesiolysis learning curves"
Research Agent → citationGraph (Di Saverio 2018) → Synthesis Agent → gap detection → Writing Agent → latexEditText (intro/methods) → latexSyncCitations (10 papers) → latexCompile → exportBibtex.
"Find code for ASBO prediction models from papers"
Research Agent → paperExtractUrls (Sebastián Valverde 2019) → Code Discovery → paperFindGithubRepo → githubRepoInspect (logistic regression for conversion risk) → runPythonAnalysis sandbox test.
Automated Workflows
Deep Research workflow scans 50+ ASBO papers via searchPapers → citationGraph → structured report with GRADE-scored laparoscopic recommendations from ten Broek et al. (2018). DeepScan's 7-step chain analyzes ten Broek et al. (2012) meta-data with runPythonAnalysis checkpoints for adhesion reduction stats. Theorizer generates hypotheses on learning curves from Di Saverio et al. (2018) patterns.
Frequently Asked Questions
What defines laparoscopic management of ASBO?
It includes diagnostic laparoscopy, selective adhesiolysis, and conversion avoidance in adhesive small bowel obstruction (ten Broek et al., 2018).
What are key methods in laparoscopic ASBO treatment?
Methods emphasize simple band lysis, anti-adhesive barriers, and experienced surgeons to prevent enterotomy (Di Saverio et al., 2018; Sebastián Valverde et al., 2019).
What are the most cited papers?
ten Broek et al. (2018 Bologna guidelines, 518 citations) and Di Saverio et al. (2013, 320 citations) lead, followed by Catena et al. (2019, 169 citations).
What open problems exist?
Challenges include standardizing patient selection, reducing enterotomy in complex cases, and defining surgeon training thresholds (Di Saverio et al., 2018).
Research Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions with AI
PapersFlow provides specialized AI tools for Medicine researchers. Here are the most relevant for this topic:
Systematic Review
AI-powered evidence synthesis with documented search strategies
AI Literature Review
Automate paper discovery and synthesis across 474M+ papers
Find Disagreement
Discover conflicting findings and counter-evidence
Paper Summarizer
Get structured summaries of any paper in seconds
See how researchers in Health & Medicine use PapersFlow
Field-specific workflows, example queries, and use cases.
Start Researching Laparoscopic management of adhesive small bowel obstruction with AI
Search 474M+ papers, run AI-powered literature reviews, and write with integrated citations — all in one workspace.
See how PapersFlow works for Medicine researchers