Subtopic Deep Dive
Impact of Hubristic Leadership on Decision-Making
Research Guide
What is Impact of Hubristic Leadership on Decision-Making?
Hubristic leadership refers to excessive self-confidence and arrogance in leaders that distorts decision-making processes in organizational and political contexts.
This subfield examines how hubris leads to biased strategic choices, often resulting in policy failures and business risks, through case studies and theoretical models. Key works include Sundermeier et al. (2020) on startup founders (50 citations) and Tourish (2019) on finance sector behaviors (24 citations). No foundational papers pre-2015 are available.
Why It Matters
Hubristic leadership contributes to real-world failures like overvalued mergers and environmental policy lapses. Park and Yoo (2017) review CEO hubris as both antecedent and consequence of firm decisions (11 citations), while Theissen and Theissen (2020) link it to increased firm pollution (7 citations). Gamache et al. (2024) show organizational hubris harms stakeholder relationships (5 citations), aiding executives in risk mitigation.
Key Research Challenges
Measuring Hubris Objectively
Quantifying hubris remains difficult due to reliance on subjective scales and retrospective analyses. Park and Yoo (2017) highlight confusion between hubris, overconfidence, and narcissism. Tourish (2019) calls for multi-dimensional assessments beyond CEO overconfidence.
Distinguishing Antecedents vs Consequences
Debate persists on whether hubris causes or results from decisions. Park and Yoo (2017) review this ambiguity in CEO contexts. Loia et al. (2022) explore hubris enabling strategies in chaos but note unclear causality.
Mitigating Organizational Hubris
Countering hubris at non-executive levels poses challenges. Gamache et al. (2024) theorize organizational hubris effects on stakeholders. ŞENDOĞDU et al. (2024) propose educational solutions in banking but lack empirical validation.
Essential Papers
Hubristic Start‐up Founders – The Neglected Bright and Inevitable Dark Manifestations of Hubristic Leadership in New Venture Creation Processes
Janina Sundermeier, Martin Gersch, Jörg Freiling · 2020 · Journal of Management Studies · 50 citations
Abstract The hubris tradition of research has been criticized for limiting its scope by associating hubris predominantly with detrimental leadership behaviours. To counteract this bias, we provide ...
Towards an organisational theory of hubris: Symptoms, behaviours and social fields within finance and banking
Dennis Tourish · 2019 · Organization · 24 citations
Hubris has become a popular explanation for all kinds of business failure. It is often reduced to the one-dimensional notion of ‘over-confidence’, particularly on the part of CEOs. There is a need ...
A Literature Review On Chief Executive Officer Hubris And Related Constructs: Is The Theory Of Chief Executive Officer Hubris An Antecedents Or Consequences?
Hyunjun Park, Young-Tae Yoo · 2017 · Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR) · 11 citations
This paper reviews the theory of Chief Executive Officer hubris and related constructs. It is to identify the area of Chief Executive Officer hubris clearly and to clarify the confusion of related ...
CEO Hubris and Firm Pollution: A Tricky Relationship
Maximilian H. Theissen, Hubertus H. Theissen · 2020 · Journal of Business Ethics · 7 citations
Managerial hubristic-behavioral strategy: how to cope with chaotic and uncertain contexts
Francesca Loia, Davide de Gennaro, Paola Adinolfi · 2022 · Management Research Review · 6 citations
Purpose How can a manager lead an organization or a team in a particularly turbulent time? How can management cope with chaos and uncertainty? Drawing on behavioral strategy theory, this study aims...
Organizational hubris: Its antecedents and consequences for stakeholder relationships
Daniel Gamache, Michael D. Pfarrer, Kevin Curran · 2024 · Strategic Management Journal · 5 citations
Abstract Research Summary Although research has explored how executive hubris shapes organizational actions, we theorize that hubris can also develop outside the executive suite. We introduce the c...
Organizational Effects of Hubris Syndrome and Potential Solutions within Managerial Educational Processes
A. Aslan ŞENDOĞDU, Nezahat Koçyiğit, Esra Yıldız · 2024 · The Universal Academic Research Journal · 3 citations
Hubris syndrome is defined as a managerial disease caused by the power possessed by people in managerial positions, and gives rise to positive and negative outcomes in organizations. For this purpo...
Reading Guide
Foundational Papers
No pre-2015 foundational papers available; start with Park and Yoo (2017) literature review for core constructs.
Recent Advances
Prioritize Sundermeier et al. (2020) for startups, Gamache et al. (2024) for organizations, and Loia et al. (2022) for chaotic contexts.
Core Methods
Core methods: theoretical modeling (Tourish 2019), surveys in banking (ŞENDOĞDU et al. 2024), historical case studies (Liapis 2024 and Blaug 2016), literature synthesis (Park and Yoo 2017).
How PapersFlow Helps You Research Impact of Hubristic Leadership on Decision-Making
Discover & Search
PapersFlow's Research Agent uses searchPapers and exaSearch to find hubris literature like 'Hubristic Start‐up Founders' by Sundermeier et al. (2020), then citationGraph reveals connections to Tourish (2019) and findSimilarPapers uncovers Gamache et al. (2024).
Analyze & Verify
Analysis Agent applies readPaperContent to extract decision-making biases from Loia et al. (2022), verifies claims with verifyResponse (CoVe), and runs PythonAnalysis on citation data for statistical trends in hubris impacts using pandas. GRADE grading assesses evidence strength in Park and Yoo (2017) reviews.
Synthesize & Write
Synthesis Agent detects gaps in hubris mitigation from ŞENDOĞDU et al. (2024), flags contradictions between Tourish (2019) and Loia et al. (2022); Writing Agent uses latexEditText, latexSyncCitations for Sundermeier et al. (2020), and latexCompile for reports with exportMermaid diagrams of hubris pathways.
Use Cases
"Analyze hubris effects on startup decisions with stats"
Research Agent → searchPapers → Analysis Agent → runPythonAnalysis (pandas on citation/impact data from Sundermeier et al. 2020) → matplotlib correlation plot of hubris and failure rates.
"Draft LaTeX review on CEO hubris in finance"
Research Agent → citationGraph (Tourish 2019 cluster) → Synthesis Agent → gap detection → Writing Agent → latexEditText + latexSyncCitations + latexCompile → formatted PDF with integrated citations.
"Find code for hubris measurement models"
Research Agent → exaSearch (hubris scales) → Code Discovery → paperExtractUrls → paperFindGithubRepo → githubRepoInspect → Python scripts for overconfidence simulations from related behavioral models.
Automated Workflows
Deep Research workflow conducts systematic reviews of 50+ hubris papers, chaining searchPapers → citationGraph → structured report on decision impacts citing Sundermeier et al. (2020). DeepScan applies 7-step analysis with CoVe checkpoints to verify Tourish (2019) claims. Theorizer generates theories linking organizational hubris (Gamache et al. 2024) to stakeholder risks.
Frequently Asked Questions
What defines hubristic leadership?
Hubristic leadership is excessive arrogance and overconfidence in leaders distorting decisions, as explored in Sundermeier et al. (2020) for startups and Tourish (2019) in banking.
What methods study hubris impacts?
Methods include literature reviews (Park and Yoo 2017), case studies (Liapis 2024 on conflicts), and theoretical models (Gamache et al. 2024 on organizations). Experimental designs appear in behavioral strategy (Loia et al. 2022).
What are key papers?
Top papers: Sundermeier et al. (2020, 50 citations) on founders; Tourish (2019, 24 citations) on organizational theory; Gamache et al. (2024, 5 citations) on stakeholder effects.
What open problems exist?
Challenges include objective measurement, causal directions (Park and Yoo 2017), and mitigation beyond executives (ŞENDOĞDU et al. 2024). Cultural implications in M&A need exploration (Da Costa et al. 2021).
Research History, Medicine, and Leadership with AI
PapersFlow provides specialized AI tools for Social Sciences researchers. Here are the most relevant for this topic:
Systematic Review
AI-powered evidence synthesis with documented search strategies
AI Literature Review
Automate paper discovery and synthesis across 474M+ papers
Deep Research Reports
Multi-source evidence synthesis with counter-evidence
Find Disagreement
Discover conflicting findings and counter-evidence
See how researchers in Social Sciences use PapersFlow
Field-specific workflows, example queries, and use cases.
Start Researching Impact of Hubristic Leadership on Decision-Making with AI
Search 474M+ papers, run AI-powered literature reviews, and write with integrated citations — all in one workspace.
See how PapersFlow works for Social Sciences researchers
Part of the History, Medicine, and Leadership Research Guide