Subtopic Deep Dive
More-Than-Human Materialities
Research Guide
What is More-Than-Human Materialities?
More-Than-Human Materialities examines the active roles of nonhuman entities like animals, matter, and environments in co-constituting human geographies and spatial practices.
This subtopic draws from hybrid geographies and actor-network theory to analyze material agencies beyond human representation (Whatmore 2002, 1875 citations; Whatmore 2006, 1147 citations). Key works explore vibrant matter in cultural geography (Lorimer 2005, 1193 citations) and multispecies entanglements (van Dooren et al. 2016, 695 citations). Over 10 high-citation papers from 2002-2016 establish its foundations in geography journals.
Why It Matters
More-Than-Human Materialities informs environmental policy by revealing how animal agencies shape infrastructure, as in Whatmore's (2006) analysis of water governance entanglements. It guides sustainable design through Tsing's (2012) mushroom foraging studies, highlighting interspecies dependencies for ecosystem management. Bakker's (2005, 641 citations) work on neoliberal water markets demonstrates its impact on resource politics, challenging anthropocentric planning in urban development.
Key Research Challenges
Capturing Nonhuman Agency
Researchers struggle to empirically trace material influences without anthropomorphizing nonhuman actors. Whatmore (2006) notes difficulties in fieldwork integrating science studies with geography. Methodological gaps persist in quantifying vibrant matter effects (Lorimer 2005).
Scaling Multispecies Interactions
Linking micro-scale animal behaviors to macro-geographies remains challenging. van Dooren et al. (2016) highlight issues in immersive ethnographies across species. Tsing (2012) addresses unruly ecological edges complicating spatial analysis.
Integrating Actor-Network Theory
Applying assemblage thinking to power and space faces critique for neglecting politics. Müller (2015, 669 citations) identifies tensions in socio-material networks. Whatmore (2002) points to gaps in hybrid topology mappings.
Essential Papers
Hybrid Geographies: Natures Cultures Spaces
Sarah Whatmore · 2002 · 1.9K citations
Introducing Hybrid Geographies SECTION ONE: BEWILDERING SPACES Displacing the Wild Topologies of Wildlife Embodying the Wild Tales of Becoming Elephant SECTION TWO: GOVERNING SPACES Unsettling Aust...
Cultural geography: the busyness of being `more-than-representational'
Hayden Lorimer · 2005 · Progress in Human Geography · 1.2K citations
© 2005 Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd 10.1191/0309132505ph531pr I Parameters, definitions and themes This is the first of three reports I will write covering an emergent area of research in cultura...
Materialist returns: practising cultural geography in and for a more-than-human world
Sarah Whatmore · 2006 · Cultural Geographies · 1.1K citations
This paper surveys the return to materialist concerns in the work of a new generation of cultural geographers informed by their engagements with science and technology studies and performance studi...
The walking interview: Methodology, mobility and place
James Evans, Phil Jones · 2010 · Applied Geography · 986 citations
Consuming dark tourism: A Thanatological Perspective
Philip R. Stone, Richard Sharpley · 2008 · Annals of Tourism Research · 824 citations
Despite increasing academic attention paid to dark tourism, understanding of the concept remains limited, particularly from a consumption perspective. That is, the literature focuses primarily on t...
Multispecies Studies
Thom van Dooren, Eben Kirksey, Ursula Münster · 2016 · Environmental Humanities · 695 citations
Scholars in the humanities and social sciences are experimenting with novel ways of engaging with worlds around us. Passionate immersion in the lives of fungi, microorganisms, animals, and plants i...
Unruly Edges: Mushrooms as Companion Species
Anna Tsing · 2012 · Environmental Humanities · 674 citations
Abstract Human nature is an interspecies relationship. In this essay, Haraway's concept of companion species takes us beyond familiar companions to the rich ecological diversity without which human...
Reading Guide
Foundational Papers
Start with Whatmore (2002, 1875 citations) for hybrid geographies framework, then Whatmore (2006, 1147 citations) for materialist practices, followed by Lorimer (2005, 1193 citations) on more-than-representational approaches.
Recent Advances
Study van Dooren et al. (2016, 695 citations) for multispecies methods and Tsing (2012, 674 citations) for companion species like mushrooms.
Core Methods
Core techniques: actor-network theory (Müller 2015), walking interviews (Evans and Jones 2010), and nonhuman charisma analysis (Lorimer 2007).
How PapersFlow Helps You Research More-Than-Human Materialities
Discover & Search
Research Agent uses citationGraph on Whatmore (2002) to map 1875-citation hybrid geographies cluster, revealing connections to Lorimer (2005). exaSearch queries 'more-than-human materialities animals infrastructure' for 250M+ OpenAlex papers. findSimilarPapers expands van Dooren et al. (2016) multispecies studies.
Analyze & Verify
Analysis Agent applies readPaperContent to Whatmore (2006) for materialist returns excerpts, then verifyResponse (CoVe) checks agency claims against Lorimer (2007). runPythonAnalysis with pandas networks citation co-occurrences; GRADE grading scores evidence strength in multispecies methods (van Dooren et al. 2016).
Synthesize & Write
Synthesis Agent detects gaps in nonhuman charisma applications (Lorimer 2007) via contradiction flagging. Writing Agent uses latexEditText for hybrid geography reviews, latexSyncCitations with Whatmore papers, and latexCompile for publication-ready manuscripts. exportMermaid visualizes actor-network assemblages from Müller (2015).
Use Cases
"Analyze citation networks in more-than-human materialities papers for animal agency trends."
Research Agent → citationGraph (Whatmore 2002) → Analysis Agent → runPythonAnalysis (pandas network plot) → matplotlib visualization of 10+ paper clusters.
"Draft LaTeX review on hybrid geographies entanglements with animals."
Synthesis Agent → gap detection (Lorimer 2005) → Writing Agent → latexEditText + latexSyncCitations (Whatmore 2006) → latexCompile → PDF with diagrams.
"Find GitHub repos with code for geospatial multispecies modeling."
Research Agent → paperExtractUrls (Tsing 2012) → Code Discovery → paperFindGithubRepo → githubRepoInspect → runnable Jupyter notebooks for foraging simulations.
Automated Workflows
Deep Research workflow scans 50+ hybrid geography papers via searchPapers, producing structured reports on material agencies with GRADE scores. DeepScan's 7-step chain verifies Whatmore (2002) topologies against recent citations using CoVe checkpoints. Theorizer generates assemblage theories from van Dooren et al. (2016) and Müller (2015) inputs.
Frequently Asked Questions
What defines More-Than-Human Materialities?
It investigates material agencies of animals and environments shaping human geographies, as defined in Whatmore (2006) and Lorimer (2005).
What methods are used?
Methods include walking interviews (Evans and Jones 2010, 986 citations), immersive multispecies ethnographies (van Dooren et al. 2016), and actor-network mappings (Müller 2015).
What are key papers?
Foundational works: Whatmore (2002, 1875 citations), Lorimer (2005, 1193 citations), Whatmore (2006, 1147 citations). Recent: van Dooren et al. (2016, 695 citations), Tsing (2012, 674 citations).
What open problems exist?
Challenges include scaling nonhuman agencies empirically and politically integrating assemblages, per Müller (2015) and Lorimer (2007).
Research Geographies of human-animal interactions with AI
PapersFlow provides specialized AI tools for Social Sciences researchers. Here are the most relevant for this topic:
Systematic Review
AI-powered evidence synthesis with documented search strategies
AI Literature Review
Automate paper discovery and synthesis across 474M+ papers
Deep Research Reports
Multi-source evidence synthesis with counter-evidence
Find Disagreement
Discover conflicting findings and counter-evidence
See how researchers in Social Sciences use PapersFlow
Field-specific workflows, example queries, and use cases.
Start Researching More-Than-Human Materialities with AI
Search 474M+ papers, run AI-powered literature reviews, and write with integrated citations — all in one workspace.
See how PapersFlow works for Social Sciences researchers