Subtopic Deep Dive

Student-Centred Curriculum Design
Research Guide

What is Student-Centred Curriculum Design?

Student-Centred Curriculum Design shifts curriculum development from teacher-directed to learner-driven models using digital tools for personalized pathways and evaluated via structural equation modeling and case studies.

This approach emphasizes student engagement, equity, and adaptation to diverse needs through ICT integration in education management. Key studies examine principals' technology leadership (Raamani Thannimalai and Arumugam Raman, 2018, 86 citations) and AHP-based decision models for e-learning (Nina Begičević et al., 2007, 25 citations). Over 200 papers address ICT adoption in student-focused curricula.

15
Curated Papers
3
Key Challenges

Why It Matters

Student-centred design boosts learner engagement and equity by aligning curricula with individual needs via digital personalization, as shown in Malaysian secondary schools where principals' technology leadership enhanced ICT integration (Raamani Thannimalai and Arumugam Raman, 2018). It supports administrators' ICT adoption decisions, improving teaching outcomes (Termit Kaur Ranjit Singh and Kalaivani Muniandi, 2012). In UAE primary schools, better information system use enabled tailored student pathways (Ala M. Abu-Samaha and Rima Shishakly, 2008).

Key Research Challenges

ICT Adoption Barriers

School administrators face challenges in selecting ICT tools due to resource constraints and training gaps, as evidenced in Malaysian schools (Termit Kaur Ranjit Singh and Kalaivani Muniandi, 2012). Gender, age, and experience influence lecturers' ICT utilization for student-centred teaching (Balarabe Yushau and Fadip Audu Nannim, 2020).

Decision Modeling Complexity

Developing models like AHP and ANP for e-learning implementation requires validating theoretical frameworks across phases (Nina Begičević et al., 2007; Nina Begičević et al., 2009). Statistical techniques must ensure reliable strategic planning (Nina Begičević and Blaženka Divjak, 2006).

Technology Leadership Gaps

Principals' visionary leadership and digital culture promotion are critical but uneven, limiting innovative student-centred tech integration (Raamani Thannimalai and Arumugam Raman, 2018). Administrators in regions like Çorum struggle with evolving tech roles (Hakan Kör et al., 2016).

Essential Papers

1.

The Influence of Principals' Technology Leadership and Professional Development on Teachers’ Technology Integration in Secondary Schools

Raamani Thannimalai, Arumugam Raman · 2018 · Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction · 86 citations

Purpose - The aim of this study was to identify the level of Principals Technology Leadership and its five constructs namely Visionary Leadership, Digital Age Learning Culture, Excellence in Profes...

2.

DEVELOPMENT OF AHP BASED MODEL FOR DECISION MAKING ON E-LEARNING IMPLEMENTATION

Nina Begičević, Blaženka Divjak, Tihomir Hunjak · 2007 · University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE) · 25 citations

Strategic planning of e-learning implementation includes decision making about the most suitable form of implementing e-learning on different levels. Decision making about e-learning implementation...

3.

VALIDATION OF THEORETICAL MODEL FOR DECISION MAKING ABOUT E-LEARNING IMPLEMENTATION

Nina Begičević, Blaženka Divjak · 2006 · University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE) · 22 citations

In the paper the possibility to use mathematical models and statistical techniques in strategic planning and decision making about e-learning is presented. Strategic planning and decision making ha...

4.

Evaluating Perceived Quality of B-School Websites

Assistant Professor, Department of Management Studies, Christ University, Bangalore · 2013 · IOSR Journal of Business and Management · 20 citations

Websites are a window for the world for looking in most of the Information and a gateway for many activities.Websites are not only a necessity but also mandatory for B-Schools.A B-School Website se...

5.

Investigation into the Utilization of ICT Facilities for Teaching Purposes among University Lecturers: Influence of Gender, Age, Qualification and Years of Teaching Experience

Balarabe Yushau, Fadip Audu Nannim · 2020 · Pedagogical Research · 18 citations

This study investigates lecturers' level of utilization of ICT facilities for teaching purposes in Nigerian universities. A descriptive survey design was adopted for the study. And a questionnaire ...

6.

Factors Affecting School Administrators’ Choices in Adopting ICT Tools in Schools – The Case of Malaysian Schools

Termit Kaur Ranjit Singh, Kalaivani Muniandi · 2012 · International Education Studies · 15 citations

The Malaysian Government has introduced various initiatives to facilitate the greater adoption and diffusion of ICT to improve capacities in the education system. Due to the extensive investment, s...

7.

Assessment of School Information System Utilization in the UAE Primary Schools

Ala M. Abu-Samaha, Rima Shishakly · 2008 · Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology · 14 citations

An international association advancing the multidisciplinary study of informing systems. Founded in 1998, the Informing Science Institute (ISI) is a global community of academics shaping the future...

Reading Guide

Foundational Papers

Start with Nina Begičević et al. (2007, 25 citations) for AHP decision models and Nina Begičević and Blaženka Divjak (2006, 22 citations) for validation, as they establish e-learning planning frameworks central to student-centred design.

Recent Advances

Study Raamani Thannimalai and Arumugam Raman (2018, 86 citations) for leadership impacts and Balarabe Yushau and Fadip Audu Nannim (2020) for ICT utilization factors.

Core Methods

Core techniques include AHP/ANP for decisions (Nina Begičević et al., 2009), surveys on tech integration (Raamani Thannimalai and Arumugam Raman, 2018), and structural equation modeling for outcomes.

How PapersFlow Helps You Research Student-Centred Curriculum Design

Discover & Search

Research Agent uses searchPapers and citationGraph to map high-citation works like Raamani Thannimalai and Arumugam Raman (2018, 86 citations) on principals' tech leadership, then findSimilarPapers for student-centred ICT studies. exaSearch uncovers niche Malaysian and UAE cases.

Analyze & Verify

Analysis Agent applies readPaperContent to extract AHP model phases from Nina Begičević et al. (2007), verifies claims with CoVe chain-of-verification, and runs PythonAnalysis for structural equation modeling replication using pandas on survey data. GRADE grading scores evidence strength in ICT utilization studies.

Synthesize & Write

Synthesis Agent detects gaps in ICT leadership literature and flags contradictions between AHP/ANP models (Nina Begičević et al., 2009). Writing Agent uses latexEditText, latexSyncCitations for Begičević papers, and latexCompile to generate reports with exportMermaid diagrams of decision workflows.

Use Cases

"Analyze ICT utilization data patterns by lecturer demographics from Yushau 2020 paper."

Research Agent → searchPapers 'Yushau ICT utilization' → Analysis Agent → readPaperContent + runPythonAnalysis (pandas crosstab on gender/age data) → matplotlib plot of utilization rates.

"Draft LaTeX section on AHP e-learning models with citations."

Research Agent → citationGraph 'Begičević AHP' → Synthesis Agent → gap detection → Writing Agent → latexEditText + latexSyncCitations (Begičević 2007/2009) → latexCompile PDF.

"Find GitHub repos with code for school admin ICT decision models."

Research Agent → searchPapers 'AHP e-learning implementation' → Code Discovery → paperExtractUrls → paperFindGithubRepo → githubRepoInspect (AHP Python scripts) → exportCsv of repo links.

Automated Workflows

Deep Research workflow conducts systematic review of 50+ ICT papers, chaining searchPapers → citationGraph → GRADE grading for student-centred design evidence. DeepScan applies 7-step analysis with CoVe checkpoints to validate Thannimalai (2018) leadership model. Theorizer generates theory on ICT barriers from Begičević decision papers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What defines Student-Centred Curriculum Design?

It prioritizes learner-driven models with digital personalization over teacher-directed approaches, evaluated by structural equation modeling and case studies.

What methods are used in key papers?

AHP and ANP models structure e-learning decisions (Nina Begičević et al., 2007; 2009); surveys assess ICT utilization (Balarabe Yushau and Fadip Audu Nannim, 2020).

What are the highest-cited papers?

Raamani Thannimalai and Arumugam Raman (2018, 86 citations) on principals' tech leadership; Nina Begičević et al. (2007, 25 citations) on AHP e-learning models.

What open problems exist?

Scaling personalized ICT pathways amid admin adoption barriers and validating models across diverse regions (Termit Kaur Ranjit Singh and Kalaivani Muniandi, 2012).

Research Educational Management and Quality with AI

PapersFlow provides specialized AI tools for Computer Science researchers. Here are the most relevant for this topic:

See how researchers in Computer Science & AI use PapersFlow

Field-specific workflows, example queries, and use cases.

Computer Science & AI Guide

Start Researching Student-Centred Curriculum Design with AI

Search 474M+ papers, run AI-powered literature reviews, and write with integrated citations — all in one workspace.

See how PapersFlow works for Computer Science researchers