PapersFlow Research Brief

Social Sciences · Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Digital Transformation in Law
Research Guide

What is Digital Transformation in Law?

Digital Transformation in Law refers to the integration of digital technologies such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, and smart contracts into legal systems, practices, and regulations to address economic and societal impacts.

The field encompasses 24,205 works examining digitalization's effects on the economy and society, including legal regulation in digital spaces, artificial intelligence, blockchain technology, smart contracts, and information security. Key focuses include challenges in smart contract implementation and platforms as detailed in 'An overview on smart contracts: Challenges, advances and platforms' (Zheng et al., 2019). Research also addresses regulatory strategies for AI systems and large generative models like ChatGPT.

Topic Hierarchy

100%
graph TD D["Social Sciences"] F["Economics, Econometrics and Finance"] S["General Economics, Econometrics and Finance"] T["Digital Transformation in Law"] D --> F F --> S S --> T style T fill:#DC5238,stroke:#c4452e,stroke-width:2px
Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan
24.2K
Papers
N/A
5yr Growth
22.2K
Total Citations

Research Sub-Topics

Why It Matters

Digital transformation in law enables automated execution of legal agreements through smart contracts, reducing enforcement costs in sectors like finance and supply chains, as explored in 'An overview on smart contracts: Challenges, advances and platforms' (Zheng et al., 2019) with 1104 citations. It shapes regulation of AI technologies, with 'Regulating Artificial Intelligence Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies' (Scherer, 2015) identifying risks in deployment, cited 545 times, and 'Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Models' (Hacker et al., 2023) proposing frameworks for large generative AI, garnering 376 citations. Privacy risks in telehealth, highlighted in 'For Telehealth To Succeed, Privacy And Security Risks Must Be Identified And Addressed' (Hall and McGraw, 2014) with 297 citations, demonstrate needs for security standards amid digital health expansions. These advancements support innovation while necessitating legal adaptations for information security and socio-economic equity.

Reading Guide

Where to Start

'An overview on smart contracts: Challenges, advances and platforms' (Zheng et al., 2019) serves as the starting point for beginners due to its high citation count of 1104 and comprehensive review of foundational challenges and platforms in blockchain legal applications.

Key Papers Explained

'An overview on smart contracts: Challenges, advances and platforms' (Zheng et al., 2019) establishes smart contract basics, which 'Is a ‘smart contract’ really a smart idea? Insights from a legal perspective' (Giancaspro, 2017) builds on by analyzing legal viability. 'Regulating Artificial Intelligence Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies' (Scherer, 2015) extends to AI regulation, informing 'Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Models' (Hacker et al., 2023), while 'For Telehealth To Succeed, Privacy And Security Risks Must Be Identified And Addressed' (Hall and McGraw, 2014) connects privacy to digital health law.

Paper Timeline

100%
graph LR P0["The Practice of Law as Confidenc...
1967 · 417 cites"] P1["For Telehealth To Succeed, Priva...
2014 · 297 cites"] P2["Regulating Artificial Intelligen...
2015 · 545 cites"] P3["Legal Foundations of Capitalism
2017 · 337 cites"] P4["An overview on smart contracts: ...
2019 · 1.1K cites"] P5["Regulating ChatGPT and other Lar...
2023 · 376 cites"] P6["AI-Generated Medical Advice—GPT ...
2023 · 309 cites"] P0 --> P1 P1 --> P2 P2 --> P3 P3 --> P4 P4 --> P5 P5 --> P6 style P4 fill:#DC5238,stroke:#c4452e,stroke-width:2px
Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan

Most-cited paper highlighted in red. Papers ordered chronologically.

Advanced Directions

Recent works like 'Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Models' (Hacker et al., 2023) with 376 citations and 'AI-Generated Medical Advice—GPT and Beyond' (Haupt and Marks, 2023) with 309 citations point to frontiers in generative AI regulation and medical-legal intersections, amid a cluster of 24,205 papers.

Papers at a Glance

Frequently Asked Questions

What are smart contracts in the context of digital transformation in law?

Smart contracts are self-executing contracts with terms directly written into code, operating on blockchain platforms. 'An overview on smart contracts: Challenges, advances and platforms' (Zheng et al., 2019) reviews their challenges, advances, and supporting platforms. They automate legal processes but face issues like legal enforceability.

How does regulation address risks in artificial intelligence systems?

Regulation of AI systems targets risks, challenges, competencies, and strategies for safe deployment. 'Regulating Artificial Intelligence Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies' (Scherer, 2015) outlines these elements for policymakers. Competencies include technical oversight and ethical guidelines.

What legal issues arise with large generative AI models like ChatGPT?

Large generative AI models require updated regulations beyond conventional AI frameworks. 'Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Models' (Hacker et al., 2023) positions these models in EU and global contexts. It advocates for tailored rules on communication, creation, and illustration impacts.

What privacy risks exist in telehealth under digital transformation?

Telehealth sensors in homes or on bodies risk transmitting sensitive data inadvertently. 'For Telehealth To Succeed, Privacy And Security Risks Must Be Identified And Addressed' (Hall and McGraw, 2014) stresses addressing these for success. Security standards prevent undermining patient trust.

What are the legal perspectives on smart contracts?

Smart contracts raise questions on validity, interpretation, and dispute resolution from a legal viewpoint. 'Is a ‘smart contract’ really a smart idea? Insights from a legal perspective' (Giancaspro, 2017) provides critical insights. They offer efficiency but challenge traditional contract law.

How do standards categorize information security in federal systems?

Standards categorize federal information and systems by impact levels on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. 'Standards for security categorization of federal information and information systems' (National Institute of Standards and Technology (US), 2004) sets these for agency operations. Categorization guides protection priorities.

Open Research Questions

  • ? How can legal frameworks ensure enforceability of smart contracts across jurisdictions?
  • ? What competencies are required for regulators to oversee risks in generative AI models?
  • ? In what ways do privacy breaches in telehealth sensors affect legal liability?
  • ? How should standards evolve to categorize security for AI-integrated legal systems?
  • ? What legal adaptations are needed for blockchain-based contracts in traditional professions?

Research Digital Transformation in Law with AI

PapersFlow provides specialized AI tools for Economics, Econometrics and Finance researchers. Here are the most relevant for this topic:

See how researchers in Economics & Business use PapersFlow

Field-specific workflows, example queries, and use cases.

Economics & Business Guide

Start Researching Digital Transformation in Law with AI

Search 474M+ papers, run AI-powered literature reviews, and write with integrated citations — all in one workspace.

See how PapersFlow works for Economics, Econometrics and Finance researchers