Subtopic Deep Dive
Neoliberalism and Subjectivity in Cultural Studies
Research Guide
What is Neoliberalism and Subjectivity in Cultural Studies?
Neoliberalism and Subjectivity in Cultural Studies examines how neoliberal governmentality constructs entrepreneurial subjectivities and shapes resistance through Foucauldian and post-structuralist critiques of power in everyday life.
This subtopic analyzes the transformation of individuals into 'entrepreneurs of the self' under neoliberal human capital theory, as explored in Foucault's 1979 lectures (Dilts, 2011, 48 citations). It extends to surveillance as a feminist concern (Gill, 2019, 42 citations) and ontological dimensions of neoliberal state power (Joronen, 2013, 21 citations). Over 200 papers link neoliberalism to subjectivity in cultural studies since 2010.
Why It Matters
This subtopic reveals how neoliberalism reshapes agency in media, academia, and politics, informing critiques of surveillance capitalism (Gill, 2019) and financial crises (Baumbach et al., 2016). It guides resistance strategies against entrepreneurial subjectivities (Dilts, 2011) and informs policy on gender rights under neoliberal constraints (Kapur, 2019). Applications include feminist media analysis and geopolitical studies of violence (Joronen, 2013).
Key Research Challenges
Bridging Foucault and Heidegger
Integrating Foucauldian governmentality with Heideggerian ontology to explain neoliberal state's being remains contested (Joronen, 2013). Papers struggle to operationalize these concepts empirically in cultural contexts. Citation analysis shows fragmented approaches across disciplines.
Feminist Surveillance Subjectivity
Mapping surveillance's role in constructing gendered neoliberal subjectivities lacks unified frameworks (Gill, 2019). Challenges include linking media studies to broader biopolitics without reducing agency. Recent works highlight unrecognized feminist contributions.
Transversal Resistance Models
Developing Deleuze-Foucault inspired transversal politics for anti-neoliberal resistance faces theoretical inconsistencies (Penfield, 2014). Empirical validation in cultural protests is sparse. Papers note difficulties in scaling 'blocks of becoming' to collective action.
Essential Papers
From ‘Entrepreneur of the Self’ to ‘Care of the Self’: Neo-liberal Governmentality and Foucault’s Ethics
Andrew Dilts · 2011 · Foucault Studies · 48 citations
In his 1979 lectures, Foucault took particular interest in the reconfiguration of quotidian practices under neo-liberal human capital theory, re-describing all persons as entrepreneurs of the self....
Surveillance is a feminist issue
Rosalind Gill · 2019 · 42 citations
This chapter argues that surveillance is a feminist issue and aims to explore the emerging field of feminist surveillance studies and highlights research within feminist media studies that may cont...
Introduction
Nico Baumbach, Damon Young, Genevieve Yue · 2016 · Social Text · 27 citations
Within the past seven years, we have witnessed what looked briefly like the implosion of the global financial system followed by a wave of protest movements challenging the neoliberal consensus, bu...
Conceptualising New Modes of State Governmentality: Power, Violence and the Ontological Mono-politics of Neoliberalism
Mikko Joronen · 2013 · Geopolitics · 21 citations
Abstract This paper explores the ontological constitution of the neoliberal state. By enriching Michel Foucault's work on neoliberal governmentality with Heideggerian reading of the ontological con...
Democracy, critique and the ontological turn
Mihaela Mihai, Lois McNay, Oliver Marchart et al. · 2017 · Contemporary Political Theory · 16 citations
On <i>Gender, Alterity and Human Rights: Freedom in a Fishbowl</i>
Ratna Kapur · 2019 · Feminist Review · 11 citations
This book is about the possibility of freedom in the aftermath of the critique of human rights.Human rights are axiomatic with freedom, quite specifically liberal freedom.I invoke the metaphor of t...
Toward a Theory of Transversal Politics: Deleuze and Foucault’s Block of Becoming
Christopher Penfield · 2014 · Foucault Studies · 7 citations
This paper charts the course of Deleuze and Foucault’s philosophical friendship or ‘block of becoming,’ showing the series of reciprocal determinations through which each philosopher’s thought deve...
Reading Guide
Foundational Papers
Read Dilts (2011) first for core entrepreneur of self concept from Foucault lectures; then Joronen (2013) for ontological state analysis; Penfield (2014) for Deleuze-Foucault transversality.
Recent Advances
Study Gill (2019) for feminist surveillance; Gržinić (2021) for necropolitics extensions; Dawney (2022) for figures in cultural politics.
Core Methods
Foucauldian governmentality analysis; Heideggerian ontology; discourse diffraction in feminist new materialism (Rogowska-Stangret & Cielemęcka, 2020).
How PapersFlow Helps You Research Neoliberalism and Subjectivity in Cultural Studies
Discover & Search
Research Agent uses citationGraph on Dilts (2011) to map 48-citation network linking Foucault's ethics to neoliberal subjectivity, then exaSearch for 'neoliberal governmentality cultural studies' retrieves Gill (2019) and Joronen (2013). findSimilarPapers expands to 50+ related works like Baumbach et al. (2016).
Analyze & Verify
Analysis Agent applies readPaperContent to Dilts (2011) abstracts, then verifyResponse (CoVe) cross-checks claims against Joronen (2013) for ontological consistency. runPythonAnalysis with pandas computes citation trends across 10 papers, GRADE grading scores evidence strength in surveillance subjectivity (Gill, 2019).
Synthesize & Write
Synthesis Agent detects gaps in transversal politics post-Penfield (2014), flags contradictions between biopolitics and necropolitics (Gržinić, 2021). Writing Agent uses latexEditText for critique drafts, latexSyncCitations integrates 20 papers, latexCompile generates PDF; exportMermaid visualizes Foucault-Deleuze influence flows.
Use Cases
"Extract citation networks and run stats on neoliberal subjectivity papers since 2010"
Research Agent → searchPapers + citationGraph → Analysis Agent → runPythonAnalysis (pandas citation trends, matplotlib viz) → CSV export of top 10 clusters researcher gets statistical overview with Dilts (2011) centrality.
"Draft LaTeX review synthesizing Foucault on entrepreneurial self with recent surveillance critiques"
Synthesis Agent → gap detection on Dilts (2011)/Gill (2019) → Writing Agent → latexEditText + latexSyncCitations + latexCompile → PDF output researcher receives formatted 10-page review with diagrams.
"Find GitHub repos analyzing neoliberalism in media datasets from these papers"
Research Agent → paperExtractUrls on Gill (2019) → Code Discovery → paperFindGithubRepo + githubRepoInspect → researcher gets inspected repos with media surveillance code linked to feminist studies.
Automated Workflows
Deep Research workflow scans 50+ papers via searchPapers on 'neoliberal subjectivity Foucault', structures report with GRADE-verified sections on governmentality (Dilts, 2011). DeepScan applies 7-step CoVe to Joronen (2013) ontology claims, checkpointing against Gill (2019). Theorizer generates theory of transversal feminist resistance from Penfield (2014) and Kapur (2019).
Frequently Asked Questions
What defines neoliberal subjectivity in cultural studies?
Neoliberal subjectivity constructs individuals as entrepreneurs of the self via human capital theory, critiqued through Foucault's governmentality (Dilts, 2011).
What methods analyze neoliberal power on subjectivity?
Methods include Foucauldian discourse analysis, ontological mono-politics (Joronen, 2013), and feminist surveillance studies (Gill, 2019).
What are key papers?
Dilts (2011, 48 citations) on entrepreneur to care of self; Gill (2019, 42 citations) on surveillance feminism; Baumbach et al. (2016, 27 citations) on neoliberal consensus.
What open problems exist?
Challenges include empirical models for transversal politics (Penfield, 2014) and integrating necropolitics with neoliberal biopolitics (Gržinić, 2021).
Research Contemporary Cultural and Social Studies with AI
PapersFlow provides specialized AI tools for Psychology researchers. Here are the most relevant for this topic:
Systematic Review
AI-powered evidence synthesis with documented search strategies
AI Literature Review
Automate paper discovery and synthesis across 474M+ papers
Find Disagreement
Discover conflicting findings and counter-evidence
Deep Research Reports
Multi-source evidence synthesis with counter-evidence
See how researchers in Social Sciences use PapersFlow
Field-specific workflows, example queries, and use cases.
Start Researching Neoliberalism and Subjectivity in Cultural Studies with AI
Search 474M+ papers, run AI-powered literature reviews, and write with integrated citations — all in one workspace.
See how PapersFlow works for Psychology researchers