PapersFlow Research Brief

Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Research Guide

What is Breast Cancer Treatment Studies?

Breast Cancer Treatment Studies are clinical and molecular research investigations evaluating therapies such as chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, surgery, radiation, and targeted agents to assess their efficacy, recurrence risk, and survival outcomes in breast cancer patients.

Breast Cancer Treatment Studies encompass 111,340 published works focused on treatment response evaluation, prognostic factors, gene expression profiling, and long-term survival outcomes. Therasse et al. (2000) in "New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors" established standardized criteria for measuring tumor shrinkage from cytotoxic agents, cited 15,648 times. Nishimura et al. (2013) in "Evaluation of Factors Related to Late Recurrence - Later than 10 Years after the Initial Treatment - in Primary Breast Cancer" identified factors linked to recurrences beyond 10 years post-treatment.

111.3K
Papers
N/A
5yr Growth
1.8M
Total Citations

Research Sub-Topics

Why It Matters

Breast Cancer Treatment Studies directly inform clinical guidelines for surgery, chemotherapy, and targeted therapies, improving patient selection and outcomes in oncology practice. Fisher et al. (2002) in "Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy, Lumpectomy, and Lumpectomy plus Irradiation for the Treatment of Invasive Breast Cancer" demonstrated that lumpectomy plus irradiation yields equivalent survival to mastectomy when margins are clear, supporting breast-conserving surgery in over 6110-cited analyses. Paik et al. (2004) in "A Multigene Assay to Predict Recurrence of Tamoxifen-Treated, Node-Negative Breast Cancer" validated a 21-gene recurrence score that quantifies distant recurrence risk in estrogen-receptor-positive cases, guiding adjuvant therapy decisions. Recent trials like DESTINY-Breast04 show trastuzumab deruxtecan improving overall survival versus physician's choice chemotherapy in HER2-low metastatic breast cancer. These studies enable personalized staging per Amin et al. (2017) in "The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual," bridging population-based to individualized prognostication.

Reading Guide

Where to Start

"New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors" by Therasse et al. (2000) first, as it provides foundational criteria for assessing any treatment response across solid tumors including breast cancer, essential before diving into specific studies.

Key Papers Explained

Therasse et al. (2000) "New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors" sets response criteria foundational for trials like Fisher et al. (2002) "Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy, Lumpectomy, and Lumpectomy plus Irradiation," which applies them to surgical outcomes. Sørlie et al. (2001) "Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses" introduces molecular subtyping, extended by van 't Veer et al. (2002) "Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer" and van de Vijver et al. (2002) "A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival," which validate signatures for prognosis outperforming clinical factors. Paik et al. (2004) "A Multigene Assay to Predict Recurrence of Tamoxifen-Treated, Node-Negative Breast Cancer" builds on these for recurrence risk in specific subtypes.

Paper Timeline

100%
graph LR P0["New Guidelines to Evaluate the R...
2000 · 15.6K cites"] P1["Gene expression patterns of brea...
2001 · 10.8K cites"] P2["Gene expression profiling predic...
2002 · 9.5K cites"] P3["A Gene-Expression Signature as a...
2002 · 6.5K cites"] P4["Effects of chemotherapy and horm...
2005 · 7.6K cites"] P5["Evaluation of Factors Related to...
2013 · 13.2K cites"] P6["The Eighth Edition AJCC2017 · 6.2K cites"] P0 --> P1 P1 --> P2 P2 --> P3 P3 --> P4 P4 --> P5 P5 --> P6 style P0 fill:#DC5238,stroke:#c4452e,stroke-width:2px
Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan

Most-cited paper highlighted in red. Papers ordered chronologically.

Advanced Directions

DESTINY-Breast04 and DESTINY-Breast11 preprints (2025) evaluate trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-low and high-risk HER2-positive early breast cancer, showing survival gains over standard regimens. PALLAS 5-year follow-up (2025) assesses palbociclib plus endocrine therapy iDFS in HR-positive cases. A-BRAVE trial (2025) tests avelumab adjuvant in high-risk triple-negative breast cancer; HER2CLIMB-05 explores TUKYSA maintenance in HER2-positive metastatic disease.

Papers at a Glance

In the News

Sacituzumab tirumotecan in previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial

Apr 2025 nature.com Xu, Binghe

Chemotherapy remains a standard treatment option for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) but is associated with limited survival. Although some targeted antibody–drug conjugates have de...

Atezolizumab plus paclitaxel and bevacizumab as first-line treatment of advanced triple-negative breast cancer: the ATRACTIB phase 2 trial

Jun 2025 nature.com Llombart-Cussac, Antonio

Here, we describe the primary results of the ATRACTIB phase 2 study, which demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile of the atezolizumab, paclitaxel and bevacizuma...

Trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-low metastatic breast cancer: long-term survival analysis of the randomized, phase 3 DESTINY-Breast04 trial

Oct 2025 nature.com

In DESTINY-Breast04 ( NCT03734029 ), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival compared with treatment of physician’s choice of chemo...

Neoadjuvant trastuzumab deruxtecan alone or followed by paclitaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab for high-risk HER2-positive early breast cancer (DESTINY-Breast11): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial - PubMed

Oct 2025 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Nadia Harbeck 1 ,

**Background:**Neoadjuvant standard-of-care for HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer is trastuzumab + pertuzumab with polychemotherapy; however, existing regimens have high toxicity burdens and ...

TUKYSA Combination Significantly Improves Progression-Free Survival as First-Line Maintenance in HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer in HER2CLIMB-05 Trial

Oct 2025 pfizer.com NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--

# TUKYSA Combination Significantly Improves Progression-Free Survival as First-Line Maintenance in HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer in HER2CLIMB-05 Trial Tuesday, October 14, 2025 - 06:45am

Code & Tools

Recent Preprints

Trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-low metastatic breast cancer: long-term survival analysis of the randomized, phase 3 DESTINY-Breast04 trial

Oct 2025 nature.com Preprint

In DESTINY-Breast04 ( NCT03734029 ), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival compared with treatment of physician’s choice of chemo...

Neoadjuvant trastuzumab deruxtecan alone or followed by paclitaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab for high-risk HER2-positive early breast cancer (DESTINY-Breast11): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial - PubMed

Oct 2025 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Preprint

**Background:**Neoadjuvant standard-of-care for HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer is trastuzumab + pertuzumab with polychemotherapy; however, existing regimens have high toxicity burdens and ...

Trastuzumab Deruxtecan plus Pertuzumab for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer - PubMed

Oct 2025 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Preprint

**Conclusions:**Trastuzumab deruxtecan plus pertuzumab led to a significantly lower risk of progression or death than THP when used as first-line treatment for HER2-positive advanced or metastatic ...

Palbociclib with adjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer: 5-year follow-up analysis of the global multicenter, open-label, randomized phase III PALLAS trial (ABCSG-42/AFT-05/PrE0109/BIG-14-13) - PubMed

Oct 2025 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Preprint

**Background:**In the phase III PALLAS trial, the addition of 2 years of palbociclib to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) did not improve short-term invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) compared wit...

A-BRAVE trial: a Phase 3 randomized trial with anti-PD-L1 avelumab in high-risk triple-negative early breast cancer patients - PubMed

Aug 2025 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Preprint

FormatAbstractPubMedPMID ## Abstract **Background:**The A-BRAVE trial evaluated the efficacy of avelumab, an anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, as adjuvant treatment of patients with ...

Latest Developments

Recent developments in breast cancer research as of February 2026 include new oral treatments for metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, blood tests for detecting cancer DNA in the bloodstream, and next-generation antibody therapies (businesswire). Additionally, advances focus on early detection, personalized treatment, and innovative therapies such as cancer vaccines and targeted drugs, with promising results from recent clinical trials (aacr.org, dana-farber.org).

Frequently Asked Questions

What criteria evaluate treatment response in breast cancer solid tumors?

Therasse et al. (2000) in "New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors" introduced standardized criteria from the International Union Against Cancer and World Health Organization for assessing antitumor activity based on tumor shrinkage from cytotoxic agents. These guidelines measure complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease. They have been cited 15,648 times and form the basis for clinical trial endpoints.

How do gene expression profiles predict breast cancer outcomes?

Sørlie et al. (2001) in "Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications" used cDNA microarrays on 78 cancers to classify tumors into subclasses correlating with clinical outcomes. Van 't Veer et al. (2002) in "Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer" and van de Vijver et al. (2002) in "A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast Cancer" showed gene signatures outperform clinical criteria for prognosis in young patients. These works, cited over 9,000 times each, enable risk stratification.

What factors predict late recurrence in breast cancer?

Nishimura et al. (2013) in "Evaluation of Factors Related to Late Recurrence - Later than 10 Years after the Initial Treatment - in Primary Breast Cancer" examined prognostic factors for recurrences beyond 10 years, cited 13,201 times. Histological grade per Elston and Ellis (1991) in "pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long‐term follow‐up" provides long-term prognostic value. These inform extended monitoring strategies.

What surgical options are supported for invasive breast cancer?

Fisher et al. (2002) in "Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy, Lumpectomy, and Lumpectomy plus Irradiation for the Treatment of Invasive Breast Cancer" found lumpectomy plus irradiation equivalent to mastectomy for survival with clear margins, cited 6,110 times. This supports breast-conserving therapy when cosmetic results are acceptable. The trial provides 20-year data on recurrence and survival.

How does multigene assay predict recurrence in node-negative breast cancer?

Paik et al. (2004) in "A Multigene Assay to Predict Recurrence of Tamoxifen-Treated, Node-Negative Breast Cancer" validated a recurrence score quantifying distant recurrence likelihood in tamoxifen-treated, estrogen-receptor-positive patients, cited 6,234 times. The assay uses 21 genes for risk assessment. It guides decisions on adjuvant chemotherapy.

What is the role of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy in early breast cancer?

The 2005 Lancet overview "Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials" analyzed randomized trials showing reduced recurrence and improved 15-year survival. Cited 7,553 times, it quantifies benefits across patient subgroups. These findings shape adjuvant treatment standards.

Open Research Questions

  • ? What molecular factors distinguish early from late recurrences beyond 10 years, as hinted in Nishimura et al. (2013)?
  • ? How can gene expression signatures from Sørlie et al. (2001) and van 't Veer et al. (2002) be integrated with AJCC staging for precise prognostication?
  • ? Which combinations of neoadjuvant therapies optimize outcomes in high-risk HER2-positive cases, per recent DESTINY-Breast11 data?
  • ? What limits the generalizability of histological grading reproducibility noted by Elston and Ellis (1991)?
  • ? How do long-term effects of adjuvant endocrine plus CDK4/6 inhibitors like palbociclib impact iDFS in HR-positive breast cancer from PALLAS trial follow-up?

Research Breast Cancer Treatment Studies with AI

PapersFlow provides specialized AI tools for your field researchers. Here are the most relevant for this topic:

Start Researching Breast Cancer Treatment Studies with AI

Search 474M+ papers, run AI-powered literature reviews, and write with integrated citations — all in one workspace.